B-OO! Will Bing and Yahoo Scare Google?

Craig Macdonald

The saga continues… we’re entering a new stage as Microsoft and Yahoo have agreed on a partnership around search advertising. The purpose of this post is to describe Covario’s views on what this partnership means for our clients — the world’s largest search advertisers.

What’s the Deal?
Bing AdCenter will become the global paid and organic search system for the combined platform. Advertisers will be able to purchase paid search inventory through Yahoo. The engineering teams will be combined in order to integrate and leverage the information flow from search to provide better targeting over time. It seems like Microsoft is buying the Panama platform and will selectively integrate functionality from the system into Bing AdCenter. The display and content network businesses of both firms will be independently owned and operated. The deal is global — and will impact engines like Naver, which are powered by the Yahoo search algorithm. Yahoo Paid Inclusion program and Site Explorer were not commented upon. Many of the mechanics are still not available, and as they come available we will share additional details.

What’s It Mean?
For advertisers, this announcement includes some good news and some bad news.

  • Market Share.  Much is being made of whether the two firms combined create a credible threat to Google. The answer is — “not for the next 2 years.”
    • Our customers spend an astonishing 77% of their paid search budgets on Google globally. In the US this share is 76%, in EMEA it is 97%! Spending on Bing/Yahoo combined totals 20% globally — with <3% in EMEA. So assuming current market dynamics — the combination of the two platforms will still be <1/3rd of the market share of Google. The combination does not change the fundamental dynamics of the paid search market for the foreseeable future.
    • It will take 6-12 months (minimum) to fully combine the systems — during which time innovation on either platform independently effectively will stop. Google will continue to innovate and our expectation is that its advantage in technology and integration with other forms of media (Youtube, Google TV, Google Mobile, etc.) will continue to expand. The likelihood is that Google actually will gain small market share in the next 12-18 months as the result of this combination.
  • Media Planning and Buying. The combination of the two platforms will be a boon to paid search advertisers.
    • Having a single platform will simplify this process — since AdCenter will allow users to eliminate the high cost / low return step of replicating campaign setup on both Yahoo and Bing. Building global campaigns through AdCenter will drive incremental spend to the network for smaller campaigns and internationally. Advertisers on Bing should be able to reach inventory on “associate” search engines like Naver in Korea if the Yahoo engine powering the engine is replaced with Bing.
    • There have already been some hysterical comments by industry gurus about how CPCs will double as the result of this integration. That seems preposterous. Why would organizations pay 2X for CPCs (and by extension CPAs) for ability to reach an only slightly expanded market? We have seen that Bing (and MSN traditionally) had higher CPCs than Google for similar keyword sets, and Yahoo had slightly lower CPCs as compared to Google. It is likely that advertisers will find a new target CPA and CPC for the combination that will be a blended average of the two — roughly equal to Google CPCs and CPAs.
    • This integration of the two platforms lessens the value of 3rd party bid management systems as the media buying process will now become about 50% simpler. We expect prices on bid management systems to come down sharply as a result of this deal — as the value proposition of using something other than AdWords and AdCenter for free, or a system like DART Search becomes overwhelming. Most systems are priced at between 2-5% media now — these prices should come down to 1-2% or lower over the next 12 months.
  • Search Engine Optimization.  There will be some ramifications to natural search programs.
    • In the past, it was acceptable to optimize only for the Google algorithm, and in some cases for Yahoo if there was enough resources and market share to support the effort. Few companies took any efforts to optimize for the particulars of the Bing algorithm.
    • One unresolved issue regarding link building is Site Explorer. This system, offered by Yahoo, is considered the best source of linking information for large scale sites. If this is not replicated in Bing, then a valuable source of link analysis information will be eliminated. The good news is that Microsoft traditionally has been very open about supplying advertisers with key information regarding their programs — and we expect that to continue.
  • Paid Inclusion.  This will impact retailers especially, who have traditionally ignored SEO knowing they could buy paid inclusion on Yahoo.
    • Paid inclusion has not been mentioned in the news to date, however, if the algorithm for natural search is Bing, we believe this offering is at risk.

If successful, we do believe that the two firms will field a superior product in 12 months time. The combined platform will drive incrementally higher returns based on improved targeting from a larger information set. That is good news for search advertisers, as it will make spending on search more effective overall.

What to Do?
Here are our Actionable Insights.

  • Bing AdCenter will be the paid search media buying system for the combined platform. We recommend making NO changes to search allocations in 2009, and to revisit a) integration success and b) changes in consumer usage of the platforms in 1H 2010.
  • Allocations should continue along the lines of Covario’s suggested Planning Assumptions.
  • If looking at 3rd party bid management systems — customers should exert pricing pressure on these firms as the process of placing paid search advertisements has become significantly less complex. Traditional pricing was between 2-5% media spend for these systems — we expect the pricing should fall to well below <2% in the next 6-12 months.
  • Reinvest in link building and revisit URL structures for SEO as the Bing algorithm weighs links more heavily than the Yahoo algorithm.
Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

4 comments

1 Elizabeth { 07.30.09 at 7:22 am }

What do you mean by CPC and CPA? Is CPC “cost per click”?

You wrote:
“Why would organizations pay 2X for CPCs (and by extension CPAs) for…”

Thanks!
-Elizabeth

2 Debbie Rosenzweig { 07.30.09 at 8:08 am }

Yes, CPC is cost per click. CPA is cost per acquisition (or sometimes cost per action) which is the amount you’re wiling to pay for or the value you associate with a conversion (such as a purchase, download, or sign up).

3 doingSEMinKorea { 07.30.09 at 9:05 pm }

Naver is not powered by Yahoo Search algo — not for a long time now. +_+ And this move won’t affect Korean market much if at all.

4 Debbie Rosenzweig { 08.03.09 at 5:42 am }

Yahoo continues to be the PPC system for Naver. It is still marketed as the Overture system, and there is a home grown algorithm used to power organic search results. Attached is a position paper that we received from our contact at Yahoo on this issue at http://www.covario.com/media/KR%20Search%20Market%20Overview_200809.pdf. Yahoo has made no claims about the future of the relationship with Naver, however, we expect Naver to either continue with Bing (due to a rollover provision in their contract) or look for an alternative technology supplier.

Leave a Comment

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree